Should we still engage in the tradition of “Counts As” or should Warhammer go the way of historicals and be precise to the point of model sculpts and colors?
So many codex books, so little time. Successor Chapters are a core tenant of playing Space Marines. They allow us, the hobbyists, to create our own unique individual forces with their own paint schemes.
It keeps Space Marines interesting. Without them we would be stuck with only:
- Ultramarines (blue)
- Raven Guard (black)
- Blood Angels (red)
- Dark Angels (green)
- Imperial Fists (yellow)
- Salamanders (green)
- Space Wolves (grey)
- Iron Hands (black)
- White Scars (white)
Not very exciting in both terms of character and color.
Now, there are 3 Successor Chapters in main GW rules, that do have their own rules:
- Black Templars
- Crimson Fists
- Flesh Tearers
Now when you look at the new Space Marine FAQ or in the new BA or DA codex, you find something interesting.
Restrictions on Successor Chapter access to Warlord Traits and Relics. Say what?
The way the rules are written, the only way to access things for Ultramarines is to ACTUALLY play Ultramarines. Same for any other founding chapter.
For example, Dark Angels have NO RULES for ANY SUCCESSOR. So let’s say you want to play as the Angels of Absolution. They are essentially DA, just bone colored instead of green. But the DA codex relics specifically state the relics are ONLY for DA with the exception of one blade.
Why? What difference does it make in the rules? None! IT IS JUST A PAINT SCHEME!!!!!
It is a concept that has LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG existed in 40k: “Counts As”. When the difference is merely what color you painted your marines, what is the problem? There is no current rules existing saying things HAVE TO be painted in any particular manner, so why base other rules on this condition?
And besides, are you really going to tell me those Praetors of Orpheus are different than Ultramarines? Or those Angels Encarmine or Angels Sanguine aren’t near IDENTICAL to Blood Angels? No. You aren’t. Because they are soooooooo close you might as well treat them the same, less GW release TOO many rules with TOO many details and little minute changes. They even practically have the SAME NAME. BLOOD, SANGUINE, ANGELS!
Clearly cannot use Blood Angel Warlord Traits…not bloody angel-y enough…
Heck, successors should be able to use CHARACTER PROFILES since they have none of their own.
Things that don’t have rules “borrow” the rules of something that is similar to their own characters. Don’t have a chapter master? Use the rules of your parent chapter. Chances are they are similar, or at least they fit the theme and feel of your force and its rules given they share a common chapter tactic!
I get that Black Templars and Crimson Fists don’t have access to Imperial Fists. It makes sense! BUT ONLY BECAUSE THEY HAVE THEIR OWN RULES. That is the difference. They have been fleshed out. If you are playing them, then yeah, it stands to reason you can’t use the parent chapter. They can’t use yours after all.
This is where GW is getting it WRONG. And if their intent wasn’t to make it as their rules suggest, and to prohibit only successors WITH RULES, they need to clarify it.
Sorry we have gone through all the trouble to make schemes and lore for all these armies just to discourage you from actually playing them- Sincerely GW
The FAQ and codices should say something like “Successor chapters may use parent chapter characters, relics and warlord traits provided they have no unique chapter tactic, characters, relics or warlord traits of their own. Example, if you play a successor chapter that has a unique character in your list from that successor chapter, you may not access parent chapter Warlord Traits or Relics unless otherwise noted. Note, characters used in such way are representative of similarly armed individuals with similar abilities and efforts should be taken to make the model representative of your chosen successor chapter in appearance.”
A little wordy but not too hard to say or comprehend IMO.
For Forge World characters, I think they should be a little more flexible for now, maybe add “You may use X-chapter chapter tactics, warlord traits and relics provided your list does not contain other characters from X-chapter” or something like that, just because it is unlikely they will get fully fleshed out chapters anytime soon.
You may be sitting there saying “Why is this even a discussion? I wouldn’t prevent someone playing the Sons of Guilliman or their own homebrew chapter from using Ultramarine stuff.” Problem is THERE ARE PEOPLE DOING JUST THAT. AND THAT IS WHAT INFURIATES ME! Even if GW is being pathetically dumb about it, we don’t have to be. There have been counts as forever, and with the new keywords, it should be just as easy to do counts as now.
I have an even bigger problem with people saying they would allow it in a friendly game but not in a tournament. Really? At least the guy who is against full time has a leg in the rules to stand on, even if they are being obtuse about it. However, to only allow it or ban it when it suits you strikes me as purely ruling for your own advantage. If you are afraid someone can beat you because of a warlord trait and your only method of preventing them from using it is saying “Your paint scheme isn’t correct, so you can’t use that. Nana-nana-boo-boo,” then you should be looking at your own list and playing ability over your opponent’s.
It’s poor sportsmanship. But people can and will be pedantic about it so long as the rules are written in the way they currently are.
Please, don’t be one of those people. Celebrate an individual’s creativity and let them play successors or homebrews without rules as their parent chapter.
As long as they are clear what chapter their models represent at the beginning, and they are not using one scheme to represent two different chapters, it won’t have ANY EFFECT WHATSOEVER on your ability to play the game. So let them enjoy their hobby.
About the Author: Gothmog
