Games Workshop talks in-depth about Age of Sigmar rules balance and their approach to keeping the game fair via the Battlescroll.
Obviously, we all want a balanced game to play, and it looks like GW is at least trying more with these current editions and might actually be taking more than just raw tournament data into account.
They also promised to try and make every warscroll viable. While this probably isn’t super possible, it’s a good goal to have, just considering how many there are.
Warhammer Community just posted a long interview and article about how they are reacting to the newest Balance Warscroll. Check it out!
GW Talks Age of Sigmar Balance & Changes
They did this section as a Q&A, so let’s check out some of the biggest questions and how GW answered them!
Q: Do you use any qualitative methods to complement the quantitative data that you gather?
A: Yes, Quantitative data refers to numbers and statistics that we can measure, while qualitative data tends to deal with the more human element of words and meaning.
To give a basic example, we might measure that a particular warscroll is overperforming using quantitative data – we can see how many rosters that warscroll is included in, and how many games were won and lost when it was included. We then build a hypothesis for why this might be happening. Is the unit simply too efficient for its points cost, benefitting from a set of synergies, or does it simply serve a particularly useful role?
This is where qualitative data comes in. We have two different external feedback groups – the external playtesting team is mostly made up of talented tournament players who focus their efforts on new rules, while the metawatch advisors group consists of tournament organisers who have a strong grasp on the overall health of the game. These teams help provide valuable insight to ensure that the changes we make are as effective as possible while minimising knock-on impacts.
We have already talked about how GW likes to make slow changes when it comes to balance, and this seems to support that idea. They often talk about minimizing big impacts but are still using data from the community and actual tournament results.
Warscroll Efficacy
Q: What are the unit-type goals for army lists? Are there goals to have a 20% split between Hero, Battleline, Artillery, Behemoth, and others?
A: One of our favourite things about Warhammer Age of Sigmar is the incredible variety of factions, and we really enjoy seeing the creativity and skill involved in building compelling army rosters. We see rosters which feature enormously powerful god-like characters and their retinues, subfactions like Gristlegore or Lofnir that focus on monsters, and hordes of zombies or ratkin overwhelming the enemy.
Our goals are focused on making as many warscrolls as possible viable and interesting to use, so we’re not currently looking to push rosters towards a more prescribed structure.
It is nice to have a game with more than one viable choice for each army; however, sometimes they seem to hit this right on the head, and in other books, not as much. Still, it’s nice to see them at least working on the idea.
Competitive Data Vs. Internal Balance
Q: Since your rolling window is 60 days, any given window is very likely to feature one new book, meaning external balance has a major kink thrown into every rolling window. Since external balance is a perpetually moving target, how do you adjust internal balance and universal options?
A: New battletomes do indeed introduce a significant challenge to balance. As mentioned above, we reference balance data when authoring a new battletome, and we try to adjust a faction’s power level to hit that 45-55% win rate from the off. I’m happy to report that this has been the case with most recent battletomes. Combined with external playtesting, this generally minimises the impact of a new battletome, and doesn’t disrupt our ability to move on to internal balance changes for factions that have a stable win rate.
We have heard very mixed reports about the actual internal playtesting that goes on and their actual playtesting pool. We did a pretty big breakdown (for 40k, but the same ideas apply) for how much they would actually have to test internally, and the numbers are quite high.
So we’re not sure if they will actually hit those numbers.
Now onto tournament data.
Q: How do you use competitive data when writing a new battletome?
A: Since we’ve built our data gathering and analysis pipeline, we’ve been making heavy use of it when composing new battletomes.
We use the internal balance data to identify units that are competing with each other in an efficiency arms race. This happens when two different units have very similar roles – for instance, long-range damage output. We often see one unit being slightly more efficient, and becoming the dominant choice. If we try to fix this by simply increasing the points cost of the dominant unit, it can tip the efficiency scales, and everyone will switch to the newly-more-efficient choice.
It’s good to see them relying on competitive data, as it often shows what is broken in a certain meta. We also agree, in a way, that if you just immediately NERF a single unit, it won’t change much.
Recent Events & Warscroll Goals
Here’s a recent snapshot of internal balance data from 459 events held between the 6th of September and the 6th of November, showing the percentage of warscrolls that are used in at least 5% of competitive lists.
There’s a significant correlation between the number of warscrolls in a battletome, and how many warscrolls are used competitively. Some units are more popular than others, so in a faction with a lot of choices, some will struggle to find a place in competitive rosters.
Around a third of our factions aren’t yet hitting our internal balance targets. Some of these factions saw internal balance adjustments in Battlescroll: Galletian Reinforcements, and we’re keen to see the impact of those changes. We will continue to roll out internal balance changes in future Battlescrolls and publications to help address the outliers.
As they said, they want the majority of warscrolls to be viable. With how many are out there, this is really hard to do, but working towards it is better than nothing.
If you want to listen to the whole thing, be sure to watch the video below.
What do you think about the state of the meta and the balance warscroll for Age of Sigmar?
Let us know in the comments of our Facebook Hobby Group, and make sure you enter the latest monthly giveaway for FREE today!
Get ad-free access to our hobby videos, a monthly crate of miniatures, and support some of the best creators out there for as little as $6 a month on Patreon!
About the Author: Travis Pasch
Travis Pasch
Job Title: Head Writer & Editor
Socials: @paschbass
About Travis Pasch: Travis has been a Warhammer 40k hobbyist since the 1990s, playing the game since Third Edition. Through extensive traveling, he’s seen a lot of the miniatures hobby from across the world, giving him a unique perspective on the latest gaming topics and trends.
Travis’s brother even owns a commission painting studio, where he’s picked up a lot of good advice and techniques for painting Warhammer and tabletop miniatures over the years, as well. Travis joined the Spikey Bits team in 2019 and has been the lead writer since 2020.
Currently, he’s working on converting all his 40k Adeptus Mechanicus models and becoming a true tech enjoyer, complete with both sad and happy robot noises!
