Another Warhammer tournament circuit is in GW’s sights, and the move could have big implications for competitive 40k players.
GW sure picked an interesting week to come knocking. WTC co-founder Işık Belül says he was pushed out of leadership on October 22 after months of behind-the-scenes fighting. Fellow co-founder Neil Kerr says that’s not how things happened; and now, national team captains are getting ready to vote on whether WTC 2027 stays in Mechelen, Belgium, or moves to an event hosted by Games Workshop.
So yeah, this is a little bigger than picking a new venue, as the WTC has been a community-run event for years. It’s the big international team tournament that national squads like Team USA plan their seasons around, and GW hasn’t been the one running the show at all.
The founder drama is getting plenty of attention, too, but we’d also be watching what GW stands to get out of this after absorbing the ITC in 2024.
- What’s happening: National team captains are getting ready to vote on keeping WTC 2027 in Mechelen or moving it to a GW-hosted event.
- What we have seen so far: A co-founder was removed on October 22; there’s a public fight over sponsor money, and one signed terrain deal has already been set aside for GW terrain in 2026.
- What’s next: GW’s terms haven’t been made public, so captains could be voting on a hosting offer without knowing who controls the rules, terrain, or sponsors.
GW Doesn’t Need to Build a World Team Event When It Can Host This One
You have to admit, the timing is pretty wild. WTC leadership is fighting, one of its founders is out, and now everyone is talking about where the money went. That’s not exactly a great spot for any independent tournament to be in.
Then GW comes along with an offer to host an event that’s already got an international competitive community behind it. And look, maybe that’s exactly what the WTC needs right now. If the people running the event can’t get along and the finances are getting tight, having GW’s resources behind it could solve some real problems.
But there’s another side to that. GW wouldn’t have to spend years building its own world team tournament, as the community has already done all that work.
Both things can be true, and GW could genuinely make the event better while also getting a pretty big opportunity out of the deal. That’s why we’d want to know a lot more before assuming GW hosting is automatically the better option.
The Army Painter Helped Keep the WTC Alive After COVID
Remember when the WTC was trying to get back on its feet after COVID? The Army Painter was one of the sponsors helping make that happen. Belül even describes them as the event’s largest sponsor when talking about the 2025 sponsorship money.
And that’s where the money trail starts getting complicated. According to Belül, roughly €10,000 to €15,000 in sponsorship and terrain licensing revenue stayed in Belgium instead of going to the main 40k event in Austria.
Now, that’s Belül’s version of the numbers. Kerr is already disputing his account of how he was removed, so we’d be careful about treating anything in this public back-and-forth as settled until there’s more to go on.
But there’s also a pretty obvious question here. What happens to a sponsor like The Army Painter if GW starts hosting? Nobody has made the current sponsorship terms between The Army Painter and the WTC public, so we don’t know what’s actually in those agreements.
Still, would GW give a competing paint company the same kind of spotlight at an event it’s hosting? We’d be surprised, but without seeing the terms, nobody can really say.
One WTC Partner Already Stepped Aside for GW Terrain
Here’s one part of this story that’s already played out, at least when it comes to the terrain. Belül confirms that Weyland-Yutani had a signed deal to supply WTC terrain through 2028. That agreement also included €5,000 a year in sponsorship.
Then GW offered official 11th Edition terrain for WTC 2026, and the existing arrangement got pushed aside. Belül says he agreed not to enforce Weyland-Yutani’s terrain obligations because the organizers felt using GW’s new terrain would be better for competitive play.
And from a player’s perspective, we get it. If teams are going to be playing 11th Edition on GW terrain, practicing on that same setup makes sense. You want to know what you’re walking into when the tournament starts.
But think about that from the sponsor’s side for a second. You’ve got a signed agreement running through 2028, you’re putting €5,000 a year into the event, and then GW offers terrain and suddenly the plan changes.
We’re not saying anyone broke a contract here. We don’t know the current legal status of that agreement, and Belül says he agreed to the change. It’s just worth remembering when people start talking about what might happen to other WTC partners under a GW-hosted event.
A WTC Founder is Now Telling Captains to Pick GW
Now here’s the part we really didn’t expect. After talking about being removed, questioning the finances, and laying out his problems with WTC leadership, Belül actually comes out in favor of GW hosting the event.
Here’s what he said:
“I think GW will be better stewards of the event, in my opinion it is an inevitability.”
One of the guys who helped found the WTC thinks GW should be running the World Team Championship. He argues that GW owns Warhammer, so it makes sense for the company to host the game’s biggest international team event. He even acknowledges that the WTC could lose some of its independent character in the process.
He just thinks the resources GW brings would make for a better tournament. Obviously, there’s a fair argument to be made about what those resources could do, but there’s also some context you can’t ignore.
Belül is making that recommendation right after being removed from leadership, and Kerr is publicly disputing his version of what happened. That doesn’t automatically make Belül wrong. It just means we’re not sure what each person is saying is true.
Hosting Isn’t Owning, But There’s No Contract To Review
There’s another detail in Belül’s statement that makes the GW offer interesting. He says the WTC brought in more revenue than ever in 2026, but the event could still end up with €10,000 or less left after everything is accounted for, even before final accounting costs.
That’s not a whole lot of breathing room for an event this size. So if GW can take some of that financial pressure off the organizers, it’s easy to see why captains might be interested.
But here’s where we’d want everyone to slow down and read the actual offer. GW hosting the WTC doesn’t necessarily mean GW owns it or gets to make every decision. Those are different things, and we haven’t seen anything that spells out exactly how the arrangement would work.
The WTC has its own competitive format, terrain standards, sponsor relationships, and international community. So before captains vote, we’d want a few things cleared up:
- What exactly is GW offering, and what decisions would it get to make?
- Would captains still control the format, terrain standards, and competitive rules?
- Who gets the final say on sponsorships, streaming rights, and branding?
- What happens to the Weyland-Yutani agreement that runs through 2028?
- Is GW simply offering to host and help fund the tournament, or does it want a bigger role in running the WTC?
Those are pretty reasonable things to ask before making a decision like this.
Final Thoughts on the GW and WTC Controversy
However the fight between Belül and Kerr shakes out, the captains have a pretty big decision in front of them. GW might be able to put on a bigger, better-funded World Team Championship, and we can absolutely see why players would be excited about that. Nobody wants to see the event struggle just because the organizers are fighting or the money is tight.
But the WTC became a major part of competitive 40k without GW running it, and that community independence is part of what makes this whole situation important. So before anyone votes to change how the event is hosted, we’d really like to see the details in writing.
Otherwise, captains are basically being asked to buy a mystery box without knowing what’s inside, which historically has not gone well for anybody dealing with Games Workshop.
For now, the big thing to watch is whether GW’s actual offer becomes public before the vote. That’s how we’ll get a better idea of whether this is mostly about helping the WTC get through a rough patch or the start of GW taking a much bigger role in the tournament.
🔗 Related Reads:
- Team USA at the WTC
- Games Workshop Officially Absorbs the ITC
- WTC 2024 Army Lists and Results
- All the Games Workshop Events and US Opens
- GW Announces the World Championships of Warhammer
- World Championships of Warhammer Heads to Spain for 2026
- Best 11th Edition Terrain Footprint Sets
- Competitive 40k Gets Another Black Eye
What do you think of the WTC controversy, and should captains take GW’s offer to host 2027?
